When discussing legal proceedings, what might constitute 'greater weight' of evidence?

In legal proceedings, the term 'greater weight' of evidence refers to the concept that certain evidence is more convincing or compelling than other evidence presented in the case. The overall credibility and reliability of the evidence presented is key to establishing this 'greater weight.'

Credibility relates to the trustworthiness of the source or evidence, while reliability pertains to the consistency and dependability of that evidence in relation to the facts of the case. When courts evaluate evidence, they consider not just the quantity of evidence, but also its quality; this can involve looking at factors such as the qualifications of witnesses, the conditions under which evidence was collected, and the relevance of the evidence to the specific case.

Therefore, while the number of witnesses, the complexity of legal arguments, and the quality of legal counsel can play roles in legal proceedings, they do not directly address the concept of 'greater weight' in the same way as the credibility and reliability of the evidence itself. Thus, focusing on these attributes of the evidence helps the court determine which side presents a stronger case.